VB survey crew in FR coveralls, hard hats and hearing protection reading relay and control compartments on a switchgear lineup
Coordination study · NEC and NFPA 70B · Power System Studies

What is the purpose of a coordination study, and does your facility need one?

It stops a fault on one feeder from blacking out the rest of the plant. For emergency and standby circuits, the NEC makes that a requirement.

A coordination study sets every relay, breaker and fuse so the device nearest a fault trips first and everything upstream stays closed. NEC 2023 Articles 700.32 and 701.32 require selective coordination for emergency and legally required standby systems, and NFPA 70B-2023 calls for coordination studies to be reviewed at intervals of no more than five years.
Written answer, no obligation to bid

Does your facility need a coordination study now?

Two answers you already know. Your verdict appears here, with the clause cited. No email needed.

Free · instant · based on NFPA 70B-2023 and NEC 2023 700.32

5 yearsMaximum review interval · NFPA 70B-2023
700.32NEC 2023 selective coordination, emergency systems
1,000+Power system studies delivered
Since 2014Signed, personally accountable engineering

Trusted by the World’s Most Demanding Plants.

Syngene
KPC
Bureau Veritas
Dupont
Siemens
FMC
JSW
ISRO
Monsanto
HPC
Calderys
NOMAC
Natco
Aurobindo
Corteva
Sandvik
Qatalum
Pfizer
AMNS
Aditya Birla
Birla
Rolls Royce
Bayer
Halliburton
Adani
Bosch
TVS
HCL
Dr. Reddy's
TATA
Nestle
Cargill
Vertiv
Tabreed
Mahindra
Jindal Steel
Kia
RPC
Amazon
ULBU
Jubilant
QAFAC
Amneal
ACME
Dalmia
Indian Oil LNG
Emerson
Lloyd's Register
OPGC
Hindalco
Navin Fluorine
Coca Cola
Hetero
Ingersoll
Indian Oil
abin
M-Power
ReNew Power
ITC
Syngenta
Grace
Asian Paints
NEEPCO
The duty, to clause level

Which NEC articles require selective coordination?

Four instruments carry the requirement. Three articles of the NEC (NFPA 70) make selective coordination mandatory for named systems. NFPA 70B makes the coordination study part of the maintenance program for every facility that adopts it.

InstrumentClauseWhat it requiresInterval
NEC (NFPA 70) 2023700.32Emergency system overcurrent devices selectively coordinated with all supply-side and load-side devices. The selection is made by a licensed professional engineer or other qualified person, documented, and made available to those who design, install, inspect, maintain and operate the system.At design, and re-evaluated when devices or the system change
NEC 2023701.32The same selective coordination duty for legally required standby systems.At design, and on change
NEC 2023708.54 · 620.62Critical operations power systems, and elevator feeders where one feeder supplies more than one driving machine.At design, and on change
NFPA 70B-2023Ch. 6 (6.4)Coordination studies as part of the electrical maintenance program, kept current with the short-circuit and incident energy studies.5 years maximum

Editions matter. NEC adoption is decided state by state, so a site may be enforced to an earlier edition than 2023. Name the edition your jurisdiction enforces in the specification. VB confirms it for every project.

Not sure which NEC edition your state enforces?

What restarts it

When is a coordination study required, beyond the five years?

The five-year interval is the ceiling. Any of these changes the fault currents or clearing times the settings were chosen for, so coordination has to be checked again.

An upstream breaker tripped for a downstream faultThe clearest sign that settings and the installed system no longer match. One feeder fault took out a whole bus.
A transformer, generator or UPS was addedA new source changes fault levels and operating scenarios that every downstream setting depends on.
Breakers, trip units or relays were replacedA replacement device rarely carries the old settings. NEC 700.32 calls for coordination to be re-evaluated when devices are replaced.
The utility supply changedA new service or a revised utility fault-level letter moves every curve on the time-current plot.
Solar or battery storage was connectedInverter sources supply far less fault current than overcurrent grading assumes, so settings that worked on the grid alone can stop working.
An audit or insurer survey asked for itInsurers and client auditors ask for the study, the settings table and the date it was signed.

Added a source or replaced devices since your last study?

Who selects it

Who must select and document selective coordination?

NEC 700.32 is specific about who makes the selection and who must be able to see it.

  1. The licensed engineer or qualified personSelects the overcurrent devices and settings that achieve selective coordination, and documents the selection.
  2. The authority having jurisdictionMust be able to see the documentation at inspection. The code requires it to be made available.
  3. The installing contractorInstalls the devices, ratings and trip settings the selection specifies, not a near equivalent.
  4. The facility ownerKeeps settings as documented, and has coordination re-checked whenever a device or source changes.

How is selective coordination applied in a data center?

In a data center the requirement applies to the emergency and legally required standby paths. Those are also the paths where a coordination failure costs the most.

  • Generator and transfer-switch paths that feed life-safety loads are selectively coordinated under NEC 700.32.
  • UPS, static transfer switch and PDU breakers carry critical load, so a mis-graded trip at the PDU can drop a whole row.
  • Arc energy reduction settings under NEC 240.87 shorten clearing times, so they are checked against coordination rather than set in isolation.
How it is done

How is a coordination study done, step by step?

VB models every protective device in ETAP or SKM PowerTools. No setting is calculated by hand.

STEP 01

Collect device data

Relay types, trip units, CT ratios and existing settings read at each device during the walkdown.
STEP 02

Build the model

Single-line verified against the installed system, with the utility fault level and every source modeled.
STEP 03

Run short circuit

Maximum and minimum fault currents at every bus: the limits each device must coordinate within.
STEP 04

Plot the curves

Time-current curves plotted for every path from source to load, with overlaps and gaps marked.
STEP 05

Set and resolve

Pickup and delay settings chosen. Where a trade-off between speed and selectivity remains, it is stated in writing.
STEP 06

Issue and sign

Settings table, curves and report signed by the engineer of record, ready for the inspector.

What does a coordination study deliver?

Two artifacts carry the proof: the settings at the device, and the curves that justify them.

Protective device setting report from a VB coordination study listing each device, manufacturer, type, frame and sensor ratingThe settings table
From a VB study. Every protective device listed with its type, frame and sensor rating, so the installer sets exactly what was coordinated.
Time-current curves from a VB coordination study: a 250 A feeder breaker plotted against a 630 A incomer trip unit, with cable damage curves and the one-line of the pathThe time-current curves
From a VB study. Feeder and incomer curves on one plot, so the margin between them is visible. Modeled in SKM PowerTools.

Who signs the study?

The study is signed by a named engineer, not by a company. Three roles keep responsibility visible.

Independent review

Reviewing engineer

Checks the model and the settings basis independently of the modeler.
Signature

Professional Engineer

A PE licensed in the facility’s state signs the study, as standard practice.
Record

Documented selection

The signed settings table is the documentation NEC 700.32 requires to be made available.

Illustrative case: one feeder fault, one bus lost

Modeled on a typical finding. A colocation data center in the US Midwest saw its main switchboard breaker trip during a fault on a downstream panel feeder. The study traced it to a replaced feeder breaker installed with factory trip settings.

What was checkedWhat was found
Feeder breaker settingsFactory defaults after replacement, never re-coordinated
Main and feeder curvesOverlapping in the short-time band, so either could trip first
FixFeeder short-time delay and main pickup reset; selectivity restored on the emergency path

Send this to the person who owns the shutdown calendar.VB Engineering capability brochure. One file, linked, not attached to this page.

Before you act

Questions facility engineers ask about coordination studies

What is a relay coordination study?

A relay coordination study sets the pickup and time delay of every protective relay, breaker trip unit and fuse so the device nearest a fault clears it first. It is built on a short-circuit study and delivered as time-current curves and a settings table.

What is the difference between an arc flash study and a coordination study?

A coordination study decides which device trips and how fast. An arc flash study uses those clearing times to calculate incident energy at each piece of equipment. Slow settings chosen for selectivity raise incident energy, so the two studies are best done together.

What is the difference between a short circuit study and a coordination study?

The short circuit study calculates the fault current at every bus. The coordination study uses those currents to set devices so they trip in sequence. Coordination cannot be done without the short circuit results.

What is a TCC curve?

A time-current curve plots how long a protective device takes to trip at each level of current. Overlaying the curves of devices in series shows whether the downstream device clears first, and by what margin.

How often must a coordination study be updated?

NFPA 70B-2023 calls for coordination studies to be reviewed at intervals of no more than five years, and sooner when devices, sources or the utility supply change.

Is NFPA 70B mandatory?

Since its 2023 edition NFPA 70B is a standard written in mandatory language, not a recommended practice. Authorities, insurers and client specifications that adopt it hold facilities to its maintenance and study requirements.

What is selective coordination?

Selective coordination is the NEC term for localizing an overcurrent condition to the circuit or equipment affected. It is achieved by choosing overcurrent devices, ratings and settings so that only the device nearest the fault opens, across the full range of fault currents.

Which systems must be selectively coordinated?

NEC 700.32, 701.32 and 708.54 require it on emergency, legally required standby and critical operations power systems, and 620.62 on elevator feeders. Many owners extend it to the whole distribution because a nuisance trip anywhere costs production.

Who can perform a coordination study?

NEC 700.32 assigns the selection to a licensed professional engineer or other qualified person engaged primarily in the design, installation or maintenance of electrical systems. VB studies are signed by a PE licensed in the facility’s state.

Is type 1 or type 2 coordination the same thing?

No. Type 1 and type 2 describe how a motor starter must withstand a short circuit under IEC 60947-4-1. Selective coordination is about which upstream or downstream device trips first.

How does NEC 240.87 arc energy reduction affect coordination?

NEC 240.87 requires an arc energy reduction method on breakers that can be set to 1,200 A or more, such as a maintenance switch or differential relaying. Those faster settings are checked against coordination so they do not trip the wrong device.

When is a coordination study required in Texas or California?

Both states enforce the NEC through state adoption, so the selective coordination articles apply to emergency, standby and critical operations systems there. Confirm the NEC edition your jurisdiction enforces before the study is specified.

Question not answered here? That is usually the one worth asking.

Send us the year of your last study

Tell us when your coordination study was last done and what has changed since. We reply in writing with where you stand and what to do next.

  • We confirm whether coordination is current against the interval and the change triggers
  • We name the NEC edition your state enforces, not the newest published
  • You get the answer in writing whether or not you invite us to bid

Confirm where you stand

Takes under a minute. No obligation to bid.
  • A written answer from a power system engineer, not a sales desk
  • Your position checked against NEC 700.32 and NFPA 70B-2023
  • The NEC edition your state enforces, named

Prefer to write? connect@groupvb.com · or WhatsApp us from the chat button

Not sure when your coordination study was last done?